Q49

Pranam Guruji I will be greatful if you can tell me whether this explanation (video) is relevant for “Tihai” also ? Humble Regards

I have been asking several veterans re: relevance of no. 3. Not got any worthwhile
answer. In the meantime I realised that just as there are several examples of 3, there
are several examples of 2 as well. We have -Sita/Ram- Nar/ Nari- Laxmi/ Narayanand so on. What Sadguru explained was concern about human behaviour/ beliefs. We
should not think only of the present. Memory and imagination are important human
faculties. He apparently does not explain how Tihai-Tallaque-Amad-and various
examples which he himself has given are based on 3. Basing on these examples, he
concludes that we should not be concerned about present only but use God given
faculties to be concerned about memory of the past and imagination of the future. I
ventured to think that as some one concluded that mathematics is all about 1 and 2
which added would have triggered the unshakable belief in 3.